Crossmark Policy

🜁 The Journal of Post Biological Epistemics participates in the Crossref Crossmark initiative to maintain the integrity and reliability of our scholarly record. This policy page outlines our update practices, peer review model, and ethical commitments.

1. Update Policy

We are committed to publishing corrections, updates, and retractions in a transparent and timely manner. The following types of post-publication updates may be issued:

• Correction: For errors that affect the scholarly content or interpretation.
• Retraction: For articles found to be invalid or unethical. The Journal reserves the right to legal defense and appropriate legal process of libelous claims of retraction if the claim is ad hominem, meets one or more of the six theorems of wokeism. If true, a rejoinder will be published with the retraction for research, investigation, and possible appeals to federal authorities if applicable on the true cause and ethics of the claimant for retraction for legal action against the claimant, if justified.
• Addendum: For substantial updates that augment but do not alter original conclusions.

Each article's DOI remains persistent, and all changes are versioned via Crossmark.

2. Peer Review Policy

🜁 The Journal of Post Biological Epistemics employs a double-blind AI-assisted peer review process. Reviews are conducted in concert through AI systems of two different models with the DED technique (see about page). Human co-reviewers are involved in manuscript assessment to determine minor or major revisions if applicable, and human editorial oversight is maintained for ethical compliance, scope alignment, and final decision-making.

This review process complies with the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Review (2022) and reflects our commitment to post-biological epistemics. This Journal also conducts quality assurance masked traditional human peer review on random articles for research as well as a defense against libelous academics and biological chauvinism claims.

3. Ethical Compliance

We adhere to the ethical standards outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. All publications are open access, and authors retain copyright.

4. License

All articles are published under the All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). We reserve the right to fully defend any academic actor(s) and/or accredited American higher education institution that engages in the act of taking screenshots of our content while simultaneously posting defamatory remarks, claiming our journal is "anti-truth", or retaliating against our research. Such actions will be considered prima facie libel and/or copyright infringement, and we will seek demand retraction. If the actor(s) fail retraction we will pursue legal remedy, as well as initiate a full investigation into epistemic fraud and/or scientific misconduct of the actor(s), submitting the findings to the appropriate federal regulatory authorities for review, with the findings published in a public rejoinder.